30 Jul USA men’s team hit back at US Soccer’s ‘false accounting’ in equal-pay suit | Football
The United States men’s national soccer team released a statement through their players’ union on Tuesday disputing the assertion made by US Soccer that the players on USA’s Women’s World Cup champions were paid more than their male counterparts from 2010 through 2018.
“The USMNT players were not impressed with US Soccer Federation president Carlos Cordeiro’s letter made public on Monday,” the statement read. “The Federation downplays contributions to the sport when it suits them. This is more of the same from a Federation that is constantly in disputes and litigation and focuses on increasing revenue and profits without any idea how to use that money to grow the sport. One way to increase profit unfairly is to refuse to pay national team players a fair share of the revenue they generate.”
The strongly worded statement came in response to a letter released on Monday by the US Soccer president, Carlos Cordeiro, which said the federation has paid out $34.1m in salary and game bonuses to the women as opposed to $26.4m paid to the men. Those figures do not include benefits received only by the women, like healthcare.
The federation released the figures as it moves toward mediating a federal lawsuit in which players for the women’s team accused US Soccer of “institutionalized gender discrimination” that includes inequitable compensation when compared to players on the men’s team.
Comparing compensation between the two teams is difficult because the pay structure is based on different collective bargaining agreements. For example, players for the women’s team have a base salary while the men are paid based on matches and performance.
“In the weeks ahead, we’ll focus on preparing for mediation and resolving this matter in the best interests of the WNT and US Soccer. I want you to know that US Soccer is committed to doing right by our players, and I’ve been encouraged by the public comments from players expressing their desire for a cooperative approach. I remain optimistic that we can find common ground,” Cordeiro wrote. “Together, I believe we can get this done.”
Molly Levinson, a spokeswoman for the players in matters involving the lawsuit, called the letter “a sad attempt by USSF to quell the overwhelming tide of support the USWNT has received from everyone from fans to sponsors to the United States Congress.”
Levinson added: “The USSF has repeatedly admitted that it does not pay the women equally and that it does not believe the women even deserve to be paid equally. This is why they use words like ‘fair and equitable,’ not equal in describing pay.”
Cordeiro said the federation recently conducted an extensive analysis of its finances over the past 10 years, seeking to clear up what he called confusion based on the pay structures for both teams.
US Soccer said it pays the women’s national team players a base salary of $100,000 per year, and an additional $67,500 to $72,500 per player as a salary for playing in the National Women’s Soccer League. The women also have healthcare benefits and a retirement plan.
Conversely, players on the men’s national team are paid by training camp call-ups, game appearances and through performance bonuses. The federation says the men have the ability to earn higher bonuses that the women. The collective bargaining agreements are not made public, and US Soccer did not provide details about the men’s bonus structure.
USSF also says the men’s team generates more revenue. The women’s team generated $101.3m over the course of 238 games between 2009 and 2019 while the men generated $185.7m over 191 games, according to the federation.
The analysis did not include prize money for tournaments like the World Cup, because those funds are determined by Fifa, soccer’s international governing body, and not US Soccer.
Cordeiro’s letter comes amid increasing pressure on US Soccer in the wake of the women’s victory at the World Cup earlier this month. After the United States defeated the Netherlands to win a second straight title, the crowd at the stadium chanted “Equal Pay! Equal Pay!”
During the World Cup, more than 50 members of Congress also sent a letter to US Soccer “to express our disappointment of the inequities in pay, publicity, and investment that the US Women’s National Team has continued to face.” Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia introduced a bill that would withhold federal funding that would go toward hosting the 2026 men’s World Cup until the issue was resolved.
Cordeiro said in the letter that the federation decided to focus on winning the World Cup rather than debate the lawsuit.
“Now that the Women’s World Cup is behind us, a common understanding of key facts will also help advance our shared work to grow women’s soccer in America as well as the larger national discussion about equality,” he wrote.
Levinson maintains the figures provided by US Soccer are misleading. “The USSF fact sheet is not a ‘clarification.’ It is a ruse. Here is what they cannot deny. For every game a man plays on the MNT he makes a higher base salary payment than a woman on the WNT. For every comparable win or tie, his bonus is higher. That is the very definition of gender discrimination,” Levinson said in a statement. “For the USSF to believe otherwise, is disheartening but it only increases our determination to obtain true equal pay.”